dc.creator | Zelditch, Morris Jr | |
dc.creator | Gilliland, Edward | |
dc.creator | Thomas, George M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-16T21:41:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-16T21:41:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/161180 | |
dc.description.abstract | a. The authors investigate the idea of nondecisions regarding redistributive political agenda. They focus on an idea that the greater the likelihood that a policy would redistribute resources, the less likely that policy is to reach a group’s agenda. Results of an experimental test of the idea, also involving legitimacy of the agenda-setting, were somewhat unclear. Self-interest of a gatekeeper was not the only source of actions, and overall, results were inconsistent with a purely self-interested explanation for behavior. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by NSF Grant No. SOC-7817434 | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Stanford Working Papers;84-9 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/ | |
dc.subject | Legitimacy | en |
dc.subject | Redistributive Agendas | en |
dc.title | The Legitimacy of Redistributive Agendas | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
local.department | Sociology | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 1984 | |