NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Pouilliart, R. | |
dc.creator | Van Hecke, F. C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-11T15:35:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-11T15:35:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-81-04-20 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/94407 | |
dc.description.abstract | An exergy analysis of carbonate solution C02 removal systems which use solution flashing shows that there is no energy saving by using a mechanical thermocompressor instead of a steam-jet ejector. In a 1000 ShT/D ammonia plant an energy saving of approx. 27 GJ/h (GHV) of natural gas is possible by using exhaust steam from a back pressure turbine instead of L.T. shift gas as the heat supply source for a Carsol C02 removal system. | en |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.tamu.edu) | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Ammonia Plant | en |
dc.subject | CO2 Removal System | en |
dc.subject | Steam Jet Ejector | en |
dc.subject | Mechanical Thermocompressor | en |
dc.title | Energy Savings for CO2 Removal in Ammonia Plants | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Carbcchim | |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Saint-Ghislain |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference