NOTE: Restrictions are in place to limit access to one or more of the files associated with this item. Authorized users must log in to gain access. Non-authorized users do not have access to these files.
Visit the Energy Systems Laboratory Homepage.
dc.creator | Penkala, B. A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-18T13:08:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-18T13:08:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-09 | |
dc.identifier.other | ESL-IE-87-09-41 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/92827 | |
dc.description.abstract | The contract provisions and ratchets contained in an electric utility's tariffs for commercial and industrial customers are often subjects of debate between the utility and its customers during regulatory proceedings. Although customers argue that these provisions are means for the utility to secure revenues from them for service not received, these provisions are necessary to properly recover the fixed demand cost of a customer to provide both intra-class and inter-class equity and to allow for a degree of revenue stability for the utility. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Energy Systems Laboratory (http://esl.eslwin.tamu.edu) | |
dc.subject | Contract Provisions and Ratchets | en |
dc.subject | Electric Utility Tariffs | en |
dc.subject | Commercial and Industrial Customers | en |
dc.subject | Interclass and Intraclass Equity | en |
dc.title | Contract Provisions and Ratchets: Utility Security or Customer Equity? | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
IETC - Industrial Energy Technology Conference
Industrial Energy Technology Conference