Show simple item record

dc.creatorPierson, Lauren
dc.creatorGanz, Jay B.
dc.creatorPustejovsky, James E.
dc.creatorReichle, Joe
dc.creatorVannest, Kimberly J.
dc.creatorWattanawongwan, Sanikan
dc.creatorFoster, Margaret
dc.creatorFuller, Marcus C.
dc.creatorHaas, April N.
dc.creatorSallese, Mary Rose
dc.creatorSmith, S. D.
dc.creatorYllades, Valeria
dc.creatorMorgan, Peyton
dc.creatorKenny, Emily
dc.creatorPaterson, Scout
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T18:54:37Z
dc.date.available2021-04-23T18:54:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/192672
dc.description.abstractThe authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies including individuals with ASD and ID that used augmentative and alternative communication devices for the purposes of communication. The documents included here resulted from a separate review of a subset of the articles where participants used high-technology AAC devices. The purpose of the current study was to review the social validity, affordability, acceptability, and feasibility of the AAC devices used during the interventions. This review includes 86 articles. See the pre-intervention social validity, post-intervention social validity, and AAC descriptive coding raw datasets attached.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research described here is supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R324A180110 to Texas A&M University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.en
dc.subjectAAC, ASD, ID, Social Validity, Communicationen
dc.titleDataset Social Validity, Affordability, Acceptability, and Feasibility of AAC Used for Individuals with ASD and IDen
dc.typeDataseten
local.departmentEducational Psychologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record