Show simple item record

dc.creatorOrr, Joseph
dc.creatorLopez, Jesus
dc.creatorImburgio, Michael
dc.creatorPelletier-Baldeli, Andrea
dc.creatorBernard, Jessica
dc.creatorMittal, Vijay
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T13:30:49Z
dc.date.available2020-05-27T13:30:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationOrr, Lopez, Imburgio, Pelletier-Baldeli, Bernard, & Mittal (2020). Adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis show qualitatively altered patterns of activation during rule learning. NeuroImage: Clinical. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102286en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/188023
dc.description.abstractBackground The ability to flexibly apply rules to novel situations is a critical aspect of adaptive human behavior. While executive function deficits are known to appear early in the course of psychosis, it is unclear which specific facets are affected. Identifying whether rule learning is impacted at the early stages of psychosis is necessary for truly understanding the etiology of psychosis and may be critical for designing novel treatments. Therefore, we examined rule learning in healthy adolescents and those meeting criteria for clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Methods 24 control and 22 CHR adolescents underwent rapid, high-resolution fMRI while performing a paradigm which required them to apply novel or practiced task rules. Results Previous work has suggested that practiced rules rely on rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) during rule encoding and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during task performance, while novel rules show the opposite pattern. We failed to replicate this finding, with greater activity for novel rules during performance. Comparing the HC and CHR group, there were no statistically significant effects, but an effect size analysis found that the CHR group showed less activation during encoding and greater activation during performance. This suggests the CHR group may use less efficient reactive control to retrieve task rules at the time of task performance, rather than proactively during rule encoding. Conclusions These findings suggest that flexibility is qualitatively altered in the clinical high risk state, however, more data is needed to determine whether these deficits predict disease progression.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health R01MH094650 to V.A.M.. J.M.O. was supported by F32DA034412 and by start-up funds from Texas A&M University. J.A.B. was supported by NIH F32MH102898, a Brain & Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award as the Donald & Janet Boardman Family Investigator, and by start-up funds from Texas A&M University.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNeuroImage: Clinical
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjecthigh risken
dc.subjectpsychosisen
dc.subjectfMRIen
dc.subjectexecutive functionen
dc.subjectrule learningen
dc.subjectneuroimagingen
dc.titleAdolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis show qualitatively altered patterns of activation during rule learningen
dc.typeArticleen
local.departmentPsychologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102286


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International