Show simple item record

dc.creatorHartberg, Yasha
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-04T22:05:41Z
dc.date.available2019-11-04T22:05:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/185608
dc.descriptionIn this lecture, students explore different approaches to science journalism such as science boosters, science interpreters, and science critics/skeptics. After explaining what those different approaches mean to them, we explore how each role might have played out at different points in the history of thalidomide, demonstrating the tradeoffs between pure boosterism and visceral skepticism.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/
dc.subjectVIBS 657en
dc.subjectIssues in Science and Technology Journalismen
dc.subjectBoostersen
dc.subjectInterpretersen
dc.subjectCriticsen
dc.subjectThalidomideen
dc.titleVarieties of Science Journalismen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.typeLearning Objecten
local.departmentVeterinary Integrative Biosciencesen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States