dc.creator | Hartberg, Yasha | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-04T22:05:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-04T22:05:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/185608 | |
dc.description | In this lecture, students explore different approaches to science journalism such as science boosters, science interpreters, and science critics/skeptics. After explaining what those different approaches mean to them, we explore how each role might have played out at different points in the history of thalidomide, demonstrating the tradeoffs between pure boosterism and visceral skepticism. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ | |
dc.subject | VIBS 657 | en |
dc.subject | Issues in Science and Technology Journalism | en |
dc.subject | Boosters | en |
dc.subject | Interpreters | en |
dc.subject | Critics | en |
dc.subject | Thalidomide | en |
dc.title | Varieties of Science Journalism | en |
dc.type | Presentation | en |
dc.type | Learning Object | en |
local.department | Veterinary Integrative Biosciences | en |