Show simple item record

dc.creatorBynum, Katie Carol
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:21:45Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:21:45Z
dc.date.created2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2004-THESIS-B94
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 67-70).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe concept behind the multiplier effect as a component of teacher staff development is that "the training of a relatively few individuals could have impact on a relatively large number of teachers" (Lesiak, Petty, & Braccio, 1975, p. 401). This research study tested the effectiveness of the multiplier effect, within the National Space Biomedical Research Institute Teacher Academy Project (NSBRI TAP), in implementing space science in school classrooms. This study collected and examined data regarding the effectiveness of the tier one teacher workshops in helping tier two teachers implement space science. This research project involved answering the following questions based on the multiplier effect: 1. Does the data show that the tier two teachers view the NSBRI TAP training as helpful in implementing space science concepts in their classrooms? 2. Do the tier two teachers report that they have or will implement the NSBRI TAP space science activities in their classrooms, and if not, what factors beyond the training affect the implementation of NSBRI TAP activities in their classrooms? The data from the research study indicated that the tier two teachers viewed the NSBRI TAP training as beneficial in helping them implement the space science concepts in their classrooms. The participant's responses indicated they were very pleased with the training and enjoyed the nature of the topics/activities provided. The results suggested that responding tier two teachers were using or planning to use the TAP space science activities in their classrooms. Those reporting not using the activities/topics provided open response reasons for not using the TAP activities which were grouped into the following categories based on similar responses: Not a Part of Curriculum, Grade Level, or Standards; Restrictions on Time, Space, or Resources; Not My Teaching Subject; and Additional Comments. The inferences based on the findings of this research study support the effectiveness of the multiplier effect as a component of this staff development project.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcurriculum and instruction.en
dc.subjectMajor curriculum and instruction.en
dc.titleAn exploratory study of the multiplier effect as a component of staff developmenten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecurriculum and instructionen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access