NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Project scheduling using fuzzy PERT and risk management
dc.creator | Yoo, Wi Sung | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:21:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:21:40Z | |
dc.date.created | 2003 | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2003-THESIS-Y66 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 61-62). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Program evaluation and review techniques (PERT) is an efficient tool for large project management. In actual project control decisions, classical PERT, which is based upon beta distribution, presents a few deficiencies. Generally speaking, classical PERT is explained as the probabilistic approach. On the other hand, activity times in the possibilistic approach such as fuzzy PERT are defined as fuzzy variables instead of random variables used in the traditional probabilistic approaches, which the classical PERT and Monte Carlo simulation. Through this study, we present one way of project scheduling using fuzzy PERT, and apply the possibilistic approach to addressing the uncertainty of a project completion date. Moreover, in fuzzy PERT, we find multiple possible critical paths through a case network, overcoming the shortcomings in the classical PERT, in which critical path is a single and deterministic path, and apply the concept in fuzzy set theory to risk assessment for a project completion date. In recent years, fuzzy PERT methods have been proposed based on possibility theory and fuzzy set theory and developed as an alternate approach to probability theory for quantifying the uncertainty related to activity times. This paper illustrates a straightforward approach for applying fuzzy calculations to address and assess project schedule uncertainty compared with the probabilistic approach, Monte Carlo method. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | civil engineering. | en |
dc.subject | Major civil engineering. | en |
dc.title | Project scheduling using fuzzy PERT and risk management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | civil engineering | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.