Show simple item record

dc.creatorSandoval Rodriguez, Angelica Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:18:14Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:18:14Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2002-THESIS-S268
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 101-105).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractIf the reservoir pressure falls below the dewpoint pressure when producing a gas condensate reservoir, liquid dropout takes place in the reservoir. Liquid builds up in the near wellbore area causing what is known as a "condensate banking". This condensate banking significantly affects the well productivity since the gas relative permeability decreases. The formation of the condensate region near the wellbore can be prevented or delayed by gas injection since this reduces the loss of condensate by maintaining pressure and by vaporizing the liquid hydrocarbon phase into the injected gas. Water injection can also be an excellent alternative to maintain the reservoir pressure above the dewpoint pressure. We performed compositional simulation of a gas condensate reservoir under natural depletion, and injection of methane, injection of carbon dioxide, produced gas recycling and water injection. To monitor the condensate banking dynamics near the wellbore area, such as oil saturation and compositional changes, we incorporated a radial local grid refinement in our global Cartesian grid for the producer well. Results showed that carbon dioxide and water injection are the scenarios where the best final condensate recovery is achieved, although downstream separation is required when injecting carbon dioxide, and water injectivity is highly affected by heterogeneities. However, produced gas recycling is a good alternative if the delay in gas sales does not produce uneconomical consequences. Methane injection reported the lowest incremental condensate recovery because of the dramatic elevation of the saturation pressure. As a consequence the reservoir pressure was below the dewpoint pressure for a longer period of time. Also a partial and total vaporization of the condensate saturation near the wellbore area was observed when carbon dioxide, methane and produced gas were injected. Finally, since GOR is directly affected by the condensate production a generalized mathematical expression to predict GOR based on field variables such as gas production rate, gas injection rate, total hydrocarbon production, and original hydrocarbon in place, when injecting different gases was obtained.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectpetroleum engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor petroleum engineering.en
dc.titleAnalysis of condensate banking dynamics in a gas condensate reservoir under different injection schemesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinepetroleum engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access