Show simple item record

dc.creatorGutierrez, Paula B
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:04:50Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:04:50Z
dc.date.created2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-G88
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 29-32).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractSurface mining involves the use of heavy equipment that would theoretically create underground vibrations sensed by pocket gophers. To determine if vibrations cause pocket gopher movement away from areas being mined, gopher movements were monitored in a hay field adjacent to an active mine pit on Big Brown Mine in Freestone County, Texas. Gophers were live-trapped in summer 2000 prior to mining activity, injected subcutaneously with a passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag, and released. Coordinates of each capture location were recorded. After mining began and spoil piles were established adjacent to the field, re-trapping was conducted. Upon capture each pocket gopher was scanned for a PIT tag and newly caught animals were tagged. Location coordinates were recorded to determine movement between capture sites. Of the 58 gophers captured and tagged, 9 individuals were recaptured. Pocket gophers did not appear to move away from mining activity, so they might have been adversely affected. However, the number of individuals in the population remained constant during the study, indicating there was no population effect. During January and February 2001, all remaining non-mined and reclaimed lands within the mine were surveyed for pocket gopher activity (mounds). Activity was found on non-mined land adjacent to reclaimed land but no activity was found on reclaimed land. Pocket gopher populations did not reestablish on reclaimed lands because of the removal of sandy soils and subsequent replacement with hard, loamy soils. If pocket gophers are desired on reclaimed lands, then it would be important to retain areas of topsoil containing at least 80% sand.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectwildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.subjectMajor wildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.titleRecolonization of surface-mined lands by pocket gophers (Geomys breviceps) in East Texas Post Oak Savannahen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinewildlife and fisheries sciencesen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access