Show simple item record

dc.creatorGomez Gomez, Julian Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:55:47Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:55:47Z
dc.date.created1999
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1999-THESIS-G664
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 72-73).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThis research is the continuation of Phase II of a joint industry project, whose main objective is to investigate the feasibility of sealing off water and gas producing zones in a horizontal well. During Phase I of the project laboratory experiments were conducted using PVC pipes up to 2-in. diameter and 3-ft. long in order to investigate the viability of using three commercial gels for use as wellborn plugs. The encouraging results from these earlier experiments led to testing the method in a full-scale 60-ft. long by 6-in. diameter wellborn model. The results obtained were again encouraging, but we needed to confirm them by repeating the experiment with some modifications. The two main objectives of this research are: (i) to investigate the effectiveness of K-MAX as a chemical wellborn plug and PERMSEAL as a formation gel in a horizontal well, and (ii) to measure the holding pressure of K-MAX. For the first research objective, the existing 60-ft. long apparatus was modified to include heater pipes inside the 12-in. PVC oboes to allow hot water circulation to achieve a temperature of about 120 F̊ during curing of PERMSEAL. The results showed that K-MAX performed satisfactorily as a chemical wellborn plug, being displaced with no slumping. The PERMSEAL was displaced radially around the wellborn, penetrating and consolidating the sand and making it apparently impermeable. The holding pressure apparatus consisted of two lengths of 5 []-in. casing (5-ft. long and 10-ft. long), open at one end and closed at the other. K-MAX gel was introduced into the pipe at the open end. Upon curing, the closed end was connected to a HPLC pump to inject water against the K-MAX plug. The holding pressures obtained were low (less than 1 psi). Somewhat higher holding pressures may be expected in the field because of the actual wellborn roughness; and with surface rams being closed during injection in the field, the formation would preferentially be injected into the problem zone. Given the encouraging results to date, it is recommended to field test the new zone isolation method.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectpetroleum engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor petroleum engineering.en
dc.titleFurther tests of new method for zone isolation in horizontal wellsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinepetroleum engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access