NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Informal and formal channels of communication preferred and used in adoption of ranching practices by cattle producers in the state of Nuevo Leon, Mexico
dc.creator | Freund, Tamara Marie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:55:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:55:40Z | |
dc.date.created | 1999 | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1999-THESIS-F75 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 63-67). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | There's an old saying that the lack of knowledge and lack of communication oftentimes coincide. When this happens, it creates a gap between the haves and have-nots of society. This gap created the basis for this study, where the investigator performed a descriptive analysis of the communication channels that exist and are preferred by the cattle ranchers of the State of Nuevo Lean, Mexico when they are deciding to adopt or reject a ranching practice. The results were summarized to make recommendations for the cattlemen's association, the Union Ganadera Regional de Nuevo Leon (Union). The investigation was supported as part of the work of the Texas-Mexico Initiative, a W.K. Kellogg Foundation project. The information is being used to continue educational bilateral programs between the neighbors of Texas and Mexico. The study was conducted in March and April of 1999, with the support of Union. Survey instruments were collected at the Union headquarters in Monterey and at several of their local associations, local organizations, throughout the state. The final sample size analyzed was 160. These surveys were tabulated for frequency sample size analyzed was 160. These surveys were tabulated for frequency comparisons. The investigator collected additional qualitative data during her visits to Nuevo Leon. Results of the thesis study showed a high credibility and preference toward Union functions, representatives, publications, and their local association branches. Those surveyed also showed a greater trust and use of personal contact versus printed, televised, or broadcast materials in their use of information. Another area that was analyzed with the surveys was the preference of feedback channels. Many surveyed felt as if no organizations were providing follow-up information. Those surveyed also reported that they would prefer more information in the areas of reproduction, nutrition, and health in cattle management. Recommendations were made based on these conclusions to be presented at bilateral Texas-Mexico workshop held in August 1999. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | agricultural education. | en |
dc.subject | Major agricultural education. | en |
dc.title | Informal and formal channels of communication preferred and used in adoption of ranching practices by cattle producers in the state of Nuevo Leon, Mexico | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | agricultural education | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.