Show simple item record

dc.creatorJohnson, Jeffrey Lee
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:52:51Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:52:51Z
dc.date.created1998
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1998-THESIS-J64
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 157-167.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the peltry trade of Louisiane, both historically and archaeologically. It traces the historical development of this trade from its pre-colonial beginnings through Louisiane's status as a military colony, then a charter colony and finally as a crown colony until the end of French rule. To the extent that the historical questions can be answered our understanding of the history of the Louisiane peltry trade increases, prompting further questions. This history also lends the archaeology of the peltry trade a historical context. This context has two aspects: 1) as background history and 2) as an avenue of confirming research in our attempt to interpret this archaeology. The archaeological investigation of the Louisiane peltry trade has two aspects: 1) general and 2) specific. In a general sense, this study investigates issues that are relevant to archaeology as a whole: 1) functional classification systems and 2) validity of artifact patterns. More specifically, for the first time the archaeology of the Louisiane peltry trade is brought together. This allows for a comparative analysis of six components from four sites to be conducted on two levels: 1) Component Profiles and 2) Artifact Patterns. The first level explores the differences in comparable artifact ratios between components encouraging their explanation, hopeftilly leading to insights concerning French behavior at these peltry trade sites. This technique is commonly in current use, but of limited benefit. The second level is comprised of three approaches: 1) visual comparison, 2) discriminant fiction analysis and 3) correspondence analysis searching for correlation and validation with the three most appropriate artifact patterns currently in use: 1) Carolina, 2) Frontier and 3) Early Fur Trade.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectanthropology.en
dc.subjectMajor anthropology.en
dc.titleThe peltry trade of Louisiane to 1763: a study in comparative archaeologyen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineanthropologyen
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access