Show simple item record

dc.creatorButorac, Julia Ann Kuhn
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:48:02Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:48:02Z
dc.date.created1997
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1997-THESIS-B873
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 162-164en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractHistorically, the four-step planning process has been used to estimate future roadway volumes and identify future roadway needs. Recently, the focus has shifted to the use of planning models to make system operations decisions. These decisions require the analysis of route-based metrics in addition to roadway volumes. The traffic assignment techniques typically used in planning models are link-based and do not explicitly enumerate or evaluate routes. To date, no research has been conducted to assess the traffic assignment techniques with respect to the routes identified in large-scale networks. An evaluation of routes identified between origin/destination (O/D) pairs using the convex combinations traffic assignment algorithm (CCA) was presented. The analysis procedures were illustrated using a simple network. Routes were analyzed in two large-scale networks at a desegregate level with respect to the assumptions of user equilibrium and several attributes that are commonly cited to influence drivers' route choice behavior. According to the principles of user equilibrium, drivers are assigned to the network in a manner such that the travel times on all used routes are equal. The results of this research revealed that the travel times among the identified routes were equal in only a small percentage of the O/D pairs. Infeasible routes were identified in several O/D pairs that had travel times that significantly exceeded that of the minimum path. The infeasible routes were typically identified in the first three iterations of the assignment. It was hypothesized that the presence of these infeasible routes affects the ability of the algorithm to converge. A heuristic strategy was developed and evaluated solution. As part of this technique, n iterations were performed using the CCA. At the nth iteration, the first k routes were removed from the solution and the assignment weights for the k+ I through n iterations were re-calculated. A new CCA assignment was performed for n+l through N iterations and the final link flows were calculated. The implementation of this strategy resulted in an improvement of the assignment results with respect to several route-based metrics.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleAn analysis of the multiple paths used in traffic assignment algorithmsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access