Show simple item record

dc.creatorBradley, Lee Norman
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:43:53Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:43:53Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-B734
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractA field study was conducted on light fabrication workers who worked 12-hour shifts to determine the effect of a high quality shoe, such as a SAS shoe, on standing fatigue. Nine participants (five male, four female) were utilized for statistical analysis. The study lasted two months with SAS shoes worn for one month, and the participant's own shoes worn for the other month. Data were collected at the end of the 12-hour shift after the completion of each test period. Physiological and subjective measures were taken before and after the shift. Psychosocial measures (Work APGAR and WES-R) were also taken. Physiological measures included: foot temperature, leg volume, foot volume, spinal area, spinal length, stature, flexibility, and heart rate. Subjective measures included a body part discomfort survey and the SAS shoe evaluation. First, the measures were tested to determine if changes over the work shift occurred. Total, I I of 14 total physiological measurements indicated a significant change over the day. Next, the SAS shoes were compared to the participant's normal working shoes. Results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) for spinal length and flexibility. Participants' spinal column shortened less when wearing SAS shoes and became more flexible when wearing SAS shoes. Significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) were also found in body part discomfort with the lower legs and feet showing significantly less increase in discomfort when participants wore the SAS shoes over the course of shift. The SAS shoe evaluation rated seven different qualities of the shoes: arch support, compression of sole, toe room, heel support, walking comfort, standing comfort, and overall fit. The SAS shoe was found to be at least average on all categories except heel support and walking comfort, where the SAS shoe was slightly below average. Ten out of the 17 participants complained of heel discomfort, and eight chose not to wear SAS shoes for the entire month. Twelve of the 17 participants preferred their own shoes to the SAS shoes. Many of these non-normally wore high quality athletic shoes. Future studies should investigate a variety of high quality shoes that individuals pick for comfort.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectsafety engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor safety engineering.en
dc.titleThe effect of SAS shoes on standing fatigue in light fabrication workersen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinesafety engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access