Show simple item record

dc.creatorBoyd, Michael Edward
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:43:52Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:43:52Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-B69
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 42-44.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe nursery/floral industry is looking for ways to reduce the amount of nitrate present in their runoff so that they may discharge it without violating Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for nitrate discharge. One such method being studied is biological denitrification. For this study, two 1.5 m x 0.3 m columns were built and placed in parallel. The columns were filled with lava rock to provide sites for denitrifying bacteria to attach themselves. The system was inoculated with water from a golf course pond. The bacterial colony was established by recirculating this pond water through the system, adding nitrate and methanol as needed. Once a colony was well established, effluent and influent nitrate/nitrite concentrations were monitored for four different influent nitrate concentrations and four different hydraulic residence times, with the intent of determining the removal characteristics. The system attained removal percentages between 62 and 96 percent, with low (< I mg N02-N/L) effluent nitrite concentrations. All effluent produced by the system met or exceeded Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for nitrate discharge, suggesting that the limits of the system were not reached. The system's response to both positive and negative step changes in the influent nitrate concentration was also studied. In general, the system was able to attain equilibrium within 6 hours of the negative step change. The positive step change was not as clear, but effluent nitrate. levels did not exceed Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for nitrate discharge, again suggesting the limits of the system were not reached. The combination of these two studies was to result in a controller equation for an automated system. However, it was determined that automation was not necessary for this type of system under a very controlled environment. A simple monitoring strategy is sufficient for producing effluent that meets Environmental Protection Agency guidelines. However, for a system that does not have tight environmental control, automatic control would be very useful.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectagricultural engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor agricultural engineering.en
dc.titleSystem dynamics and controller development for denitrification using a packed column bioreactoren
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineagricultural engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access