Show simple item record

dc.creatorTorregrossa, Ginger Kaye
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:38:52Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:38:52Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-T689
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on contrasting styles of instruction (text vs. computer-based) while holding all other variables constant including learning objectives, assessment tools, and teacher influence. Students were arbitrarily divided into treatment groups by class period. Knowledge gains were evaluated by score differences between pretests and posttests using a single multiple-choice test developed by the researcher. Students were also given a Learning Style Inventory based on the Dunn and Dunn model. A descriptive analysis of LSI scores was used to determine any correlation between particular learners and their level of achievement. Results showed no significant difference between the text-based instruction and the electronic curriculum delivered by an interactive videodisc system. Also, no particular learner profile favored one form of instruction over the other.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjecteducation curriculum and instruction.en
dc.subjectMajor education curriculum and instruction.en
dc.titleA comparison of student achievement using electronic vs. traditional physical science curriculaen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineeducation curriculum and instructionen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access