NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
The evaluation of two extraction procedures for the recovery of organic chemicals from spiked soils
dc.creator | Huebner, Henry Joseph | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:32:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:32:03Z | |
dc.date.created | 1993 | |
dc.date.issued | 1993 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1993-THESIS-H887 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Hazardous waste site assessments are based on the results of analytical procedures used to identify and quantify chemicals contaminating the soil. The accuracy of these results is fundamentally linked to the ability of a solvent extraction procedure to desorb and remove contaminants from a sample matrix prior to analysis. The recovery efficiency of an extraction procedure will indeed affect the quality of analytical data and may influence waste site assessments. The objective of this study was to compare the extraction efficiencies of the automatic Soxtec and U. S. EPA SW846 Soxhlet methods. In phases one and two of the experiment, extractions were performed on silicon dioxide matrices and silt-loam soils spiked with benz(a)pyrene, pentachlorophenol, and naphthalene at three concentration levels. Each test sample contained either an individual chemical or a 1: 1: I mixture of all three chemicals. Phase three consisted of extractions performed on a silt-loam soil spiked with a coal tar complex mixture. Soxtec samples were sequentially extracted with dichloromethane and methanol while Soxhlet samples were extracted with dichloromethane., Gas chromatographic results obtained from sample extract analysis were used to calculate percent recoveries of the chemicals. The recoveries of benz(a)pyrene and pentachlorophenol in the Soxtec procedure ranged from 55-88% and 49-88% respectively, For the Soxhlet method, the recoveries ranged from 4673% and 52-87% respectively, Complex mixture recoveries ranged from 50-60% for both procedures. The mutagenic potentials of the solvent extracts were evaluated using Salrnonella typhimtii- ium strain TA98 with and without metabolic activation. Assay results indicated a positive correlation between mutagenic response, assay controls, and the chemical concentrations derived from GC analysis. The data indicate that the Soxtec method which requires 2 hours, is as effective as the traditional 16 hour Soxhlet extraction procedure for recovering organic chemicals from contaminated matrices. The Soxtec method, thus, offered substantial time and cost savings. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | soil science. | en |
dc.subject | Major soil science. | en |
dc.title | The evaluation of two extraction procedures for the recovery of organic chemicals from spiked soils | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | soil science | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.