Show simple item record

dc.creatorHuebner, Henry Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:32:03Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:32:03Z
dc.date.created1993
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1993-THESIS-H887
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractHazardous waste site assessments are based on the results of analytical procedures used to identify and quantify chemicals contaminating the soil. The accuracy of these results is fundamentally linked to the ability of a solvent extraction procedure to desorb and remove contaminants from a sample matrix prior to analysis. The recovery efficiency of an extraction procedure will indeed affect the quality of analytical data and may influence waste site assessments. The objective of this study was to compare the extraction efficiencies of the automatic Soxtec and U. S. EPA SW846 Soxhlet methods. In phases one and two of the experiment, extractions were performed on silicon dioxide matrices and silt-loam soils spiked with benz(a)pyrene, pentachlorophenol, and naphthalene at three concentration levels. Each test sample contained either an individual chemical or a 1: 1: I mixture of all three chemicals. Phase three consisted of extractions performed on a silt-loam soil spiked with a coal tar complex mixture. Soxtec samples were sequentially extracted with dichloromethane and methanol while Soxhlet samples were extracted with dichloromethane., Gas chromatographic results obtained from sample extract analysis were used to calculate percent recoveries of the chemicals. The recoveries of benz(a)pyrene and pentachlorophenol in the Soxtec procedure ranged from 55-88% and 49-88% respectively, For the Soxhlet method, the recoveries ranged from 4673% and 52-87% respectively, Complex mixture recoveries ranged from 50-60% for both procedures. The mutagenic potentials of the solvent extracts were evaluated using Salrnonella typhimtii- ium strain TA98 with and without metabolic activation. Assay results indicated a positive correlation between mutagenic response, assay controls, and the chemical concentrations derived from GC analysis. The data indicate that the Soxtec method which requires 2 hours, is as effective as the traditional 16 hour Soxhlet extraction procedure for recovering organic chemicals from contaminated matrices. The Soxtec method, thus, offered substantial time and cost savings.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectsoil science.en
dc.subjectMajor soil science.en
dc.titleThe evaluation of two extraction procedures for the recovery of organic chemicals from spiked soilsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinesoil scienceen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access