Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorArnold, Keith A.
dc.creatorCarlson, Steven Jo
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:51:55Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:51:55Z
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-541470
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractA model depicting the flow of energy through a great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus) during the winter season in Texas is described. The model is based on information from literature and field observations on distance flown, literature data on food habits, weather data from the roost and surrounding area, and allometric equations for determining existence metabolism; it predicts the daily energy budget of a bird for a typical month. Model simulations with modified conditions of increased flight distance from the roost and decreased roost site protection showed that increased flight had a greater impact on the energy budget than did decreased roost site protection. Great-tails that fly over 63 m begin to neutralize an energetic gain from reduced thermoregulatory costs when roost temperatures are raised 1 C. An energetically sound foraging radius of about 40 km was determined by using estimated feeding rates, stomach capacities, rate of passage of food, and model output. The simulations also show that the greatest energetic advantage in roosting is protection from the wind. The criteria for roost site selection by great-tailed grackles appear to be: (1) ample food supplies need to be within 40 km; (2) the site provides protections from the wind and, secondarily, the temperatures; (3) the site's structural features provide ample perching sites. Management implications relative to the energy budget of this species are discussed. The model's predictability of existence metabolism was assessed by comparing model output to observed values of existence metabolism. The food consumption experiments revealed significant differences between the sexes in existence metabolism, but no significant differences in metabolizable efficiencies (ME = 74.5%) The consequence of the male's larger size is a greater total requirement for energy; however, the female requires more energy per gram than the male.en
dc.format.extentviii, 48 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectWildlife and Fisheries Sciencesen
dc.subject.classification1983 Dissertation C284
dc.subject.lcshGracklesen
dc.subject.lcshBirdsen
dc.subject.lcshBehavioren
dc.subject.lcshBioenergeticsen
dc.titleThe bioenergetics of roost site selection for great-tailed gracklesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberChmielewski, Margaret
dc.contributor.committeeMemberFolse, L. Joseph
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGrant, William E.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc11069369


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access