NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
A longitudinal evaluation of the Edinburg Bilingual Reading Project
dc.contributor.advisor | Ilika, Joseph | |
dc.creator | Hord, Larry Dean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-21T21:47:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21T21:47:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1976 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-508606 | |
dc.description | Vita. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose. Federal funding and the Bilingual Education Act of 1968 have provided for numerous bilingual education programs. The rationale for bilingual education is well supported by scholars who have studied language maintenance and acculturation as well as language acquisition and concept formation. A major problem encountered in bilingual education this fat has been program evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate one of these bilingual programs using a method of longitudinal evaluation. Procedures. A class of students who received instruction in grades K-2 in the Region I Bilingual Reading Project in Texas comprised the experimental group. The control group was composed of 27 older siblings of the experimental group. The control group received instruction in the traditional school curriculum. Both groups had been administered the California Achievement Test biannually each year they were in school. CAT test data were reconstructed for both groups. The first CAT test that each S took at the beginning of his schooling was considered the pretest. The last test that each S took prior to January 20, 1974, was considered the posttest. Transformation of grade equivalent scores made comparisons possible. The five subject areas of the CAT analyzed are included in the following: (1) Vocabulary, (2) Comprehension, (3) Total Reading, (4) Language Usage and Structure, and (5) Spelling. A series of graphs was constructed. Grade equivalent scores for the two groups were plotted in order to provide a visual comparison of the educational growth of the Ss.. | en |
dc.format.extent | xiv, 210 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Education, Bilingual | en |
dc.subject | Education, Bilingual | en |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en |
dc.subject | Education (Curriculum and Instruction) | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1976 Dissertation H811 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Education, Bilingual | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Evaluation | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Education, Bilingual | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Texas | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Edinburg | en |
dc.title | A longitudinal evaluation of the Edinburg Bilingual Reading Project | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Barker, Donald G. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Campbell, Jack | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Elmquist, Karl | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Shutes, Robert | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Taylor, Lloyd C. | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 2486579 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.