Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHeitschmidt, R. K.
dc.contributor.advisorScifres, C. J.
dc.creatorSchultz, Rodney Duan
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:34:53Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T21:34:53Z
dc.date.issued1982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-365329
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractAboveground net primary production (ANPP), seasonal herbaceous dynamics, and herbage quality were evaluated in 1979 and 1980 in the northern Rolling Plains of Texas following the installation of brush management treatments in 1974. Treatments chosen for study were: untreated; aerial application of 2,4,5-T + picloram(1:1) at 0.6 kg/ha; and root plowed and seeded with Kleingrass. Environmental factors were related to the vegetational responses following brush management. Aboveground net primary production was estimated by summing peak standing crop measurements of current year's growth (live + recent dead tissue) by species functional groups. Averaged over the 2 years, ANPP on the seeded areas was 369 g/m('2) as compared to 201 and 202 g/m('2) on the untreated and sprayed areas, respectively. Herbage dynamics were similar on the untreated and sprayed areas, with standing crop measurements following the same trend during both years. Standing crop values were generally higher at each sampling date on the seeded area, with peak standing crop occurring approximately 1 month later than on untreated and sprayed areas. Herbage on untreated and sprayed rangeland was dominated by buffalograss. Crude protein (%) and digestible energy (kcal/g) were generally higher in the herbage from the untreated and sprayed plots than from the seeded area. Differences among treatments in species composition and amount of live material were the principle factors contributing to the quality differences. Brush management effected herbage productivity, growth dynamics, quality, and species diversity on the seeded area compared to the untreated area. However, the same parameters on the area sprayed with 2,4,5-T + picloram generally did not differ from those on the untreated site.en
dc.format.extentxix, 160 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectRange Scienceen
dc.subject.classification1982 Dissertation S387
dc.subject.lcshBrushen
dc.subject.lcshManagementen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.subject.lcshGrasslandsen
dc.subject.lcshProduction controlen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.titleNet primary production and seasonal herbaceous dynamics following brush managementen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBriske, D. D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberZuberer, D. A.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc9917696


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access