Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGrossman, Steven D.
dc.creatorPasewark, William Robert
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T21:04:37Z
dc.date.available2020-09-02T21:04:37Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-22711
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe term "economic interest" represents an investment in a natural resource that will eventually produce a return on capital. The possession of economic interest is necessary for the taxpayer to (1) claim the depletion deduction and (2) recognize a capital gain rather than ordinary income on the sale of natural resources. This study used a population of decisions made by the Tax Court and the Internal Revenue Service in macro-case analysis in an attempt to identify and estimate the importance of the factors used by the judicial courts and the IRS to determine the existence of economic interest and how these factors differ in a variety of circumstances (different decision makers, different types of transactions, and different natural resources). Decision criteria of the models were also compared to the regulations. The Tax Court and the IRS were found to use different decision criteria to determine economic interest. The Tax Court decisions used only one of the variables contained in the regulations and made no distinction between depletion and capital gains transactions in the determination of the existence of economic interest. The rulings made by the IRS used another variable in addition to the two contained in the regulations and tended to alter decision criteria in depletion transactions compared to capital gains transactions. Only limited evidence supported differences in decision criteria for economic interest decisions between various natural resources.en
dc.format.extentx, 158 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor accountingen
dc.subject.classification1986 Dissertation P281
dc.subject.lcshNatural resourcesen
dc.subject.lcshTaxationen
dc.subject.lcshLaw and legislationen
dc.subject.lcshUnited Statesen
dc.titleDetermining economic interest in natural resourcesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineAccountingen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. D. in Accountingen
thesis.degree.levelDoctorialen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCrumbley, D. Larry
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKilpatrick, Bob
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSmith, Laurel
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWiggins, Casper
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc17993574


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access