Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKruse, Ronald J
dc.contributor.authorAnbar, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Sarah E
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Bernard P
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-15T22:21:24Z
dc.date.available2015-08-15T22:21:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/154797
dc.description.abstractResearch teams may be studied as social systems organized along dimensions of status, such as rights to evaluate others and to allocate rewards. “Status consistency” is the degree to which salient statuses an individual possesses are at the same level; “status ambiguity” occurs when ranks are unknown or unclear. Relevant dimensions of status are those both within a team and in the larger society, such as gender and ethnicity. Both status inconsistency and status ambiguity interfere with communication, and that reduces team efficiency.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report Stanford Sociology;#56
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectstatus consistencyen_US
dc.subjectstatus ambiguityen_US
dc.subjectteam efficiencyen_US
dc.titleInterdisciplinary Research Teams as Status Systemsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
local.departmentSociologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States