Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPedersen, Susan J.
dc.creatorBulu, Saniye Tugba
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T22:47:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-09T01:27:06Z
dc.date.available2011-08-08T22:47:23Z
dc.date.available2011-08-09T01:27:06Z
dc.date.created2008-05
dc.date.issued2009-05-15
dc.date.submittedMay 2008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2739
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on two areas under the overarching theme of the effects of domain-general and domain-specific scaffolds with different levels of support, continuous or faded. First, the study investigated the effects of scaffolds on learning of scientific content and problem-solving outcomes. Second, the study examined whether students’ prior knowledge and meta cognitive skills predict their success in problem solving across different scaffolding conditions. A total of nineteen classes were randomly assigned to one of the four scaffolding conditions: domain-general continuous (DG-C), domain-general faded (DG-F), domain specific continuous (DS-C), and domain-specific faded (DS-F). Each class had access to different worksheets depending on the scaffolding condition they had been assigned. All students engaged in four problem-solving activities for thirteen class periods. Students’ scores on a multiple-choice pretest, post test, inventory of meta cognitive self-regulation, and four recommendation forms were analyzed. Results of the study revealed that students’ content knowledge in all conditions significantly increased over the thirteen class periods. However, the continuous domain specific condition outperformed the other conditions on the post test. Although domain general scaffolds were not as effective as domain-specific scaffolds on learning of scientific content and problem representation, they helped students develop solutions, make strong justifications, and monitor their learning. Unlike domain-specific scaffolds, domain-general scaffolds helped students transfer problem-solving skills even when they were faded. In terms of individual differences, results indicated that while students with lower prior knowledge and lower meta cognitive skills benefited from the domain general continuous condition, students with lower regulation of cognition benefited from the domain-general faded condition. Moreover, while students with lower prior knowledge, lower knowledge of cognition, and lower problem representation benefited from the domain-specific continuous condition, students with lower problem representation benefited from the domain-specific faded condition. In contrast, results of the study suggested that scaffolds did not substantially benefit the students with higher prior knowledge and higher meta cognitive skills. Several suggestions are discussed for making further improvements in the design of scaffolds in order to facilitate ill-structured problem solving in hypermedia learning environments.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectProblem-solvingen
dc.subjectscaffoldingen
dc.subjectpromptsen
dc.subjectmetacognitionen
dc.subjectprior knowledgeen
dc.titleScaffolding middle school students' content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environmenten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Psychologyen
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Psychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCifuentes, Lauren D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDooley, Kim E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKnight, Stephanie L.
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record