Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWarden, Robert
dc.creatorSrinivasan, Urmila
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-16T00:08:30Z
dc.date.available2010-01-16T00:08:30Z
dc.date.created2009-05
dc.date.issued2010-01-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-05-608
dc.description.abstractGeometry deals with form, shape, and measurement and is a part of mathematics where visual thought is dominant. Both design and construction in architecture deal with visualization, and architects constantly employ geometry. Today, with the advent of computer software, architects can visualize forms that go beyond our everyday experience. Some architects claim that the complex forms of their works have correlations with non-Euclidean geometry, but the space we experience is still Euclidean. Given this context, I have explored possible correlations that might exist between mathematical concepts of geometry and the employment of geometry in architectural design from a historic perspective. The main focus will be to describe the two phenomena historically, and then investigate any connections that might emerge from the discussion. While discussing the way geometry has been approached in architecture, I have focused on the Renaissance, Modern, and Post-modern phases as they have a distinct style and expression. Andrea Palladio, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Frank Gehry's works will be case studies for the Renaissance, Modern, and Post-modern phases respectively. One of the important conclusions of this study is that architects use geometry in a more subconscious and intuitive manner while designing. Certain approaches to geometry can be determined by the way an architect deals with form and space. From the discussions of the works of Palladio, Wright, and Gehry, it can be concluded that from a two-dimensional simple approach to form and space in architecture, there has been a development of thinking about complex forms three dimensionally. Similarly, in mathematics, geometry has developed from a two-dimensional and abstract description of our surroundings to something that can capture the complex and specific nature of a phenomena. It is also shown that architects rarely come up with new concepts of geometry. Significant developments in geometry have always been in the domain of mathematics. Hence, most correlations between geometry in architecture and geometry in mathematics develop much later than the introduction of those concepts of geometry in mathematics. It is also found that the use of Euclidean geometry persists in architecture and that later concepts like non-Euclidean geometry cannot be used in an instrumental manner in architecture.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectGeometryen
dc.subjectArchitectureen
dc.subjectMathematicsen
dc.subjectPalladioen
dc.subjectWrighten
dc.subjectGehryen
dc.titleApproaches to the Use of Geometry in Architecture: A study of the works of Andrea Palladio, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Frank Gehryen
dc.typeBooken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentArchitectureen
thesis.degree.disciplineArchitectureen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPaul, Vivian
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGeller, Susan
dc.type.genreElectronic Thesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record