NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Interpreting slavery at plantation museums and historic sites
dc.creator | Durden, Amber K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:20:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:20:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2003 | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2003-THESIS-D87 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 41-42). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Interpreting slavery can be a difficult and controversial task. Recent literature has shown that the majority of plantation museums and historic sites, which historically enslaved African-Americans, are currently ignoring the institution of slavery. Very few interpretive programs are available which discuss the enslaved and the contributions of African Americans to modern society. This paper will examine the available literature concerning the interpretation of the enslaved and the institution of slavery. For a site to develop a successful interpretive program it is crucial that it is familiar with and cognizant of the principles of interpretation. Cable and Beck's principles of interpretation will be explained and discussed. These principles will assist interpreters in designing a successful and effective interpretative program on slavery. Because most historic sites are lacking an interpretive program on slavery, the paper will conclude by outlining several guidelines and suggestions for designing such a program. Currently there is no literature available to assist interpreters in interpreting such controversial issues such as slavery. By providing generalized guidelines, interpreters may better develop a strategy for planning their interpretive programs as well as be aware of those topics that are both appropriate and inappropriate to discuss. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | recreation, parks and tourism sciences. | en |
dc.subject | Major recreation, parks and tourism sciences. | en |
dc.title | Interpreting slavery at plantation museums and historic sites | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | recreation parks and tourism sciences | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.Ag. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.