Show simple item record

dc.creatorSchulte, Jaret Roy
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:08:45Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:08:45Z
dc.date.created2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-S356
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 94-97).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractFocusing on the increasing emphasis of value added to the beef industry, and the many different techniques being suggested, an economic investigation into the merits of such marginal programs is warranted. One such attempt at value added is the Premium Stocker Sale developed by the Jordan Cattle Auction in San Saba, Texas. This premium sale features the commingling of different producers' cattle based on similar weights, quality, and general breed types. Producers registered to participate in the sale must also background the cattle according to TEX VAC45 guidelines adopted and certified by the auction company. It is hypothesized that the commingling of cattle and the certified backgrounding program create a more valuable lot of cattle when compared to the price of cattle sold at traditional auctions in Texas, which sell individual producer's cattle separately, and only a few head at a time. This research focused on three main objectives. The first objective was to compare prices received at the premium sale in San Saba with those received at traditional auctions in Texas, then test for a statistical difference. The second objective was to use previously developed hedonic pricing models to test if certain characteristics of a lot of cattle impacted the price received. The third objective of the study was to develop a methodology for calculating the full cost of backgrounding cattle in order to participate in the premium sale. This full cost calculation of backgrounding was then compared to the price difference found at the premium sale to test whether or not the added value covered the corresponding added costs. A significantly different premium was found for cattle sold at the commingled/backgrounded sale in San Saba when compared to the Texas Combined Weighted Average. Statistical analysis found that the type of breed, color, muscle score, sex, and weight of the lot, along with the lot's size, impacted the sale price of a lot of cattle. Lastly, it was found that pro forma budgeting is needed due to the variation in the size of premiums, and that for the short period considered feeding margins will for the most part be negative, requiring a positive marketing margin in order for preconditioning to realize a positive net return.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectagricultural economics.en
dc.subjectMajor agricultural economics.en
dc.titleEconomic viability of a commingled/backgrounded cattle saleen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineagricultural economicsen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access