NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
An extraordinary reversal: hermeneutics and the divide between the sciences
dc.creator | McDaniel, William Caleb | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:06:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:06:15Z | |
dc.date.created | 2001 | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-M3245 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 131-139). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Theories of hermeneutics -- the study of interpretation -- have been used both to support and to reject the division of the natural and human sciences. Wilhelm Dilthey and Charles Taylor defend that divide, while Richard Rorty and Clifford Geertz have contested its validity. The arguments of Dilthey and Taylor stem from the classical hermeneutical tradition founded by Friedrich Schleiermacher. On the other hand, Rorty and Geertz have claimed support for their position from the philosophical hermeneutics of Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer. In this thesis, however, I argue that the confrontation between Dilthey and Heidegger has been misconceived. Geertz and Rorty are actually committed to the same hermeneutical principles as Dilthey and Taylor, which makes their rejection of a divide between the sciences an "extraordinary reversal." Once the history of hermeneutics has been clarified and its central figures properly characterized, I argue that Dilthey and Heidegger probably would have agreed about the former' s divorce of the sciences. I also argue that Geertz and Rorty are more committed to that division than they themselves may readily admit. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | philosophy. | en |
dc.subject | Major philosophy. | en |
dc.title | An extraordinary reversal: hermeneutics and the divide between the sciences | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.A. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.