Show simple item record

dc.creatorLeeftink, Gerrit J.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:06:08Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:06:08Z
dc.date.created2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-L4497
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 56-61).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the practices used to drill and complete three horizontal, openhole wells in the Alpine field on the north slope of Alaska. This study is a continuation of the work performed in conjunction with CEA-73. In the first phase of CEA-73, laboratory work was completed to study the most important parameters in drilling and completing openhole horizontal wells. This portion of the study applies the knowledge gained in the lab to field examples. It includes (1) a combination of previous laboratory work, (2) the monitoring of fieldwork where advanced well completion techniques have been applied, and (3) the performance analysis in wells where the techniques have been used. Through the analysis of well files (correspondence, personal interviews, test analyses, and other related data), the auditor studies the development of the well from the initial well plan through its production phase. The audit is designed to show if improved drilling and completion techniques result in more productive wells. The well audit reflected good planning throughout the Alpine horizontal well program. State of the art technology was considered, researched, and applied throughout the process. Using horizontal well decline type curve techniques, production data were studied to determine the degree of skin in each well. Results from the analysis indicate that there was a high level of impairment in the wells, indicated by the significant skin. It is suspected that despite good planning practices, the formation damage was caused by one or more factors, including: inadequate cleanup design, polymer degradation, and mud handling/carbonate sizing. Furthermore, the possibility of removing substantial amounts of this damage using the current methods is uncertain. Moderate remediation might be possible with altered cleanup practices.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectpetroleum engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor petroleum engineering.en
dc.titleAlpine field, Alaska: openhole completion and wellbore cleanup methods in an Artic environmenten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinepetroleum engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access