Show simple item record

dc.creatorDunn, Allison L
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:03:54Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:03:54Z
dc.date.created2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-D87
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 50-52).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractPrevious research regarding Foa and Foa's Resource Theory does not address whether the level of intimacy shared between the actors affects their resource conceptualization. Furthermore, siblings have not been utilized as a separate intimacy group in any Resource Theory study. Consequently, this study is the first to examine both. I used four of Resource Theory's six resource categories in multiple quasi-experiments to determine whether changing the actors' level of intimacy from sibling to stranger affected how the same resource being exchanged was conceptualized in terms of Foa and Foa's Resource Theory. The results were analyzed in four different areas: ( l ) if gender affects resource conceptualization, (2) if increasing intimacy between the actors affects resource conceptualization, (3) if increasing intimacy between the actors causes them not to want to participate in resource reciprocity, and (4) if increased intimacy between the actors causes less variance in their responses. The results only partially supported the second of my four propositions, but it is this proposition that has the most potential for future research implications.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectsociology.en
dc.subjectMajor sociology.en
dc.titleHow intimacy affects resource conceptualizationen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinesociologyen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access