NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
How intimacy affects resource conceptualization
dc.creator | Dunn, Allison L | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:03:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:03:54Z | |
dc.date.created | 2001 | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-D87 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 50-52). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Previous research regarding Foa and Foa's Resource Theory does not address whether the level of intimacy shared between the actors affects their resource conceptualization. Furthermore, siblings have not been utilized as a separate intimacy group in any Resource Theory study. Consequently, this study is the first to examine both. I used four of Resource Theory's six resource categories in multiple quasi-experiments to determine whether changing the actors' level of intimacy from sibling to stranger affected how the same resource being exchanged was conceptualized in terms of Foa and Foa's Resource Theory. The results were analyzed in four different areas: ( l ) if gender affects resource conceptualization, (2) if increasing intimacy between the actors affects resource conceptualization, (3) if increasing intimacy between the actors causes them not to want to participate in resource reciprocity, and (4) if increased intimacy between the actors causes less variance in their responses. The results only partially supported the second of my four propositions, but it is this proposition that has the most potential for future research implications. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | sociology. | en |
dc.subject | Major sociology. | en |
dc.title | How intimacy affects resource conceptualization | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | sociology | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.