NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Comparison of enrichment techniques for the isolation of Salmonella sp. from swine feces
dc.creator | Andrews, Kimberley Denise | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T23:02:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T23:02:20Z | |
dc.date.created | 2001 | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2001-THESIS-A55 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 29-30). | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | From July 1998 to November 1999, 1541 pre-slaughter fecal samples, 428 post-slaughter cecal/rectal content samples, and 430 ileocecal lymph node samples were cultured for Salmonella sp. A total of 371 isolates of Salmonella were recovered using seven comparative techniques for isolation. A standard protocol, consisting of xylose lysine tergitol-4 agar (XLT4) paired with a primary enrichment in tetrathionate broth with iodine (TTH) and secondary enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis R10 broth (RV), was used on all samples. This standard protocol was compared with seven different protocols for Salmonella isolation. The first experiment compared the standard protocol to a procedure utilizing xylose lysine desoxycholate agar (XLD) paired with enrichment in malachite green-mannitol-selenite broth (MMS). The second experiment compared XLD agar to XLT4 agar using the standard protocol. The third and fourth experiments compared the standard protocol a similar protocol that varies of the amount of TTH added to the experimental RV. The fifth and sixth experiments compared the standard protocol to a deviation of the same protocol that varies the amount of iodine solution added to the TTH. The seventh experiment compared the standard protocol to the use of RV as primary enrichment broth alone. Experiments one, four, and seven demonstrated that the standard protocol was significantly superior. Experiments two, three, five, and six were equivocal with no significant difference found. However, in experiment six there was a trend toward significance for improved salmonella recovery by the addition of 1.0 ml of iodine to the TTH. Using the standard protocol, the secondary enrichment in RV was found to be greatly beneficial when used with pre-slaughter fecal samples and post-slaughter cecal/rectal content samples. Significance was established with a p-value <0.05. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | veterinary microbiology. | en |
dc.subject | Major veterinary microbiology. | en |
dc.title | Comparison of enrichment techniques for the isolation of Salmonella sp. from swine feces | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | veterinary microbiology | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.