Show simple item record

dc.creatorSebesta, Jason Daryl
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T23:01:10Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T23:01:10Z
dc.date.created2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2000-THESIS-S43
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 35-38).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractBecause of increased deer/vehicle collisions involving endangered Florida Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) developed a plan to construct a fence along a portion of US Highway 1 that crosses Big Pine Key, Florida. A problem associated with this plan involved access points where small public roads bisect US-1, which would allow deer to enter the fenced portion of the highway. Currently there are no structures (deer guard) that are effective in preventing deer from entering access roads. The purpose of this study was to design, construct, and test a deer guard that would allow normal passage of vehicles while preventing Key deer from crossing. Between September 1998 and December 1999, deer guard prototypes were constructed and tested within a deer-holding facility at the Welder Wildlife Foundation Refuge near Sinton, Texas. Wild-trapped Texas white-tailed deer (O. v. tenanus) were used as test animals. Deer-guard prototypes were subjected to 4 tests: (1) no incentive to cross; (2) extra food and water incentive to cross; (3) fawn separated from doe; and, (4) estrous doe separated from mature buck. Three deer guard designs tested included: (1) a guard installed at ground level; (2) a guard raised off the ground; and, (3) a raised guard with sloped ends. Deer guards were tested at 2 lengths (either 3.6 m or 5.5 m) and had 1.9 cm cross-member spacing. Effectiveness was monitored visually and/or with infrared triggered camera systems. All tests were conducted for 2 weeks except the fawn separated from doe tests (2 hours). Tests were replicated 4 times except the buck/doe separation test, which was replicated only twice. No deer crossed a raised 5.5-m guard during any of the tests. It is recommended that FDOT construct and install deer guards measuring at least 7.3 m with the center portion raised 0.6 m above the ground. Ends should be sloped to facilitate vehicular traffic and cross-member spacing should be 1.9 cm or more. Side panels should extend the length of both sides of the guard. With slight modifications, the design should be useful with other species.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectwildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.subjectMajor wildlife and fisheries sciences.en
dc.titleDesign and evaluation of deer guards for Florida Key Deeren
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinewildlife and fisheries sciencesen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access