Show simple item record

dc.creatorBizzell, Cydney Jill
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T15:43:44Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T15:43:44Z
dc.date.created2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2000-THESIS-B52
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 60-63).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe impact and performance of a shoreline cleaning agent in the environment, Corexit®9580 (EC9580®), was evaluated by conducting a controlled release of weathered crude oil (Arabian-light) in May 1998 at a well characterized and fully instrumented wetland research site. The research facility is located on the San Jacinto River near Channelview, Texas. It was originally set aside in 1994 to monitor intrinsic remediation and recovery subsequent to a catastrophic flood that ruptured four pipelines releasing petroleum products that impacted the shoreline. Since 1994, three controlled oil applications (1996 and 1997) were conducted to evaluate proposed remediation strategies for wetland environments including nutrient additions, oxidant additions, and bioaugmentation. This latest phase of research (1998) is a continuation of studies to evaluate non-invasive oil removal techniques from sensitive wetland environments. For this controlled oil release experiment, 21 plots were divided into three treatment regimes: six oiled, no-action control plots; six shoreline cleaner treated plots - high shoreline cleaner application dose; and six shoreline cleaner treated plots - low application shoreline cleaner dose. Three plots were also maintained as unoiled controls. The plots were separated into six blocks to achieve a randomized complete block design. To determine the effectiveness of the shoreline cleaner applications, triplicate sediment samples from all plots were taken as a function of time from May 15, 1998 until August 21, 1998. These samples were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons (TEM and GC/MS), toxicity, microbial counts, nutrient levels and redox potential. Target hydrocarbon concentrations were normalized to 17α, 21β-(H) hopane, a conservative terpenoid biological marker, to account for physical petroleum losses and to reduce the heterogeneity in the hydrocarbon data. The results show that the addition of a shoreline cleaning agent to an oiled estuarine environment does not inhibit the biodegradation of the oil. Additionally, the shoreline cleaner did not enhance the removal of the petroleum from the estuarine environment.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleEvaluation of a shoreline cleaner for enhanced removal of petroleum from a wetlanden
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access