Show simple item record

dc.creatorWeatherly, Benjamin Harrison
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:58:01Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:58:01Z
dc.date.created1999
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1999-THESIS-W33
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 36-37).en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThirty-seven selected styles of subprimals of beef were obtained from the fabrication lines of three foodservice purveyors to assist in the development of a software support program for the beef foodservice industry. They were fabricated into bone-in or boneless foodservice cuts and associated components by trained meat cutters. Once fabrication was completed, data were analyzed to determine means and standard errors on percentage yields and timing scores for each subprimal. Each style selected was used to generate mean foodservice yields and labor requirements, which were calculated from foodservice weights (kg) and processing times (s). Subprimals consisting of only one cutting style were evaluated for mean foodservice yields and processing times and, no comparisons were made within cut. These subprimals included: rib-roast ready; ribeye roll, lip-on, bone-in; boneless brisket, deckle-off; inside round; and bottom sirloin flap. Subprimals consisting of multiple cutting styles also were evaluated for mean foodservice yields and processing times, and comparisons were made within cut. These subprimals included: ribeye rolls; top sirloin caps; tenderloin butts; ribeye rolls, lepton; shorthorns; strip loins; top sirloin butts; and tenderloins. Significant variations in foodservice yields and cutting times were found within cutting styles. In general, as the target portion size decreased, the number of steaks increased, causing total foodservices yield to decrease and total processing time to increase. Furthermore, an inverse relationship tended to exist between processing times and foodservice yields. This dataset will serve as the foundation for the software program CAFES (Computer Assisted Foodservice Evaluation System).en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectanimal science.en
dc.subjectMajor animal science.en
dc.titleFoodservice yield and fabrication times for beef as influenced by purchasing options and merchandising stylesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineanimal scienceen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access