NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Analysis of well test data from gas condensate reservoirs using single-phase dry gas methods: guidelines and examples
dc.creator | Bonilla Kalil, Jose Ricardo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:51:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:51:43Z | |
dc.date.created | 1998 | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1998-THESIS-B66 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references: p.70-71. | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | The "problem" with modelling the performance of a well in a gas condensate reservoir system is that for a truly rigorous solution we require a compositional mass balance on the entire system. In particular, the pseudofunction transformations (pseudopressure and pseudotime) are not only functions of pressure, but are also functions of saturation, where saturation is uniquely tied to the compositional material balance of the system--and saturation (even near the well) can not be obtained at a sufficient accuracy to solve this problem in full detail. Our goal is to establish that the single-phase "dry gas" analog can generally be used to estimate formation properties from well test in gas condensate reservoirs. This is not a trivial issue--using the single-phase solution is much easier, we need not account for saturation with this approach. This thesis will provide example analyses and establish practical guidelines for the analysis and interpretation of well test data in gas condensate reservoirs, using the single-phase "dry gas" approach. We use the typical semilog (radial flow) and log-log (type curve) analysis techniques. The rate history is properly incorporated into the time (or pseudotime) functions using the Agarwall "effective" time function or Homer 2 "effective" time function. In addition to traditional well test analysis (various Cartesian, semilog, and log-log plots), we also simulated the entire test sequence (i.e., all data) using the van Everdingen-Meyer approach.(3,4) | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | petroleum engineering. | en |
dc.subject | Major petroleum engineering. | en |
dc.title | Analysis of well test data from gas condensate reservoirs using single-phase dry gas methods: guidelines and examples | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | petroleum engineering | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.