Show simple item record

dc.creatorArchuleta, Kathryn Diane
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:51:30Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:51:30Z
dc.date.created1998
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1998-THESIS-A73
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 67-80.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe link between personality and job performance has usually been studied using self-report personality data. The present study looked at whether an interviewer's ratings of an applicant's personality can predict future job performance. A sample of 124 undergraduates acted as applicants for a middle management job by interviewing for the position. At the conclusion of the interview, the interviewer rated the personality of the applicant using the NEO Five Factor Personality Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1989). The NEO-FFI measures personality using the Big Five taxonomy of traits, Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. After being "hired" for the middle management position, the subjects performed an in-basket task, which served as the job performance measure. Results showed that interviewers' ratings of Conscientiousness can significantly predict total job performance (r,y = .21, p < .05), and can predict as well as self-ratings. Interviewers' ratings of Conscientiousness also accounted for significant variance in total ob performance beyond self-ratings alone (p =.05). When the sample was divided by interview structure into two groups, structured versus unstructured, an interviewer's ratings of Neuroticism was found to be a better predictor of job performance in the structured interview than in the unstructured interview, while the reverse was true for ratings of Extraversion. Overall, these results suggest that observer, specifically interviewer, ratings of personality may provide unique information for the prediction of job performance in a selection setting.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectpsychology.en
dc.subjectMajor psychology.en
dc.titleInterviewer's ratings of personality: can these ratings predict job performance?en
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinepsychologyen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access