Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBoothe, Dawn
dc.creatorDodge, Meagan A.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-22T20:39:42Z
dc.date.available2013-02-22T20:39:42Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1998-Fellows-Thesis-D64
dc.descriptionDigitized from print original stored in HDR. Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.descriptionProgram year: 1997/1998en
dc.description.abstractEnrofloxacin is an antimicrobial drug approved for veterinary use only. Enrofloxacin is administered orally or parenterally. Veterinarians may dilute the drug for injection or topical use in a commercial physiological solution. The injectable commercially used Enrofloxacin, Baytril, is sometimes too strong, causing vomiting, and much smaller concentrations are effective topically. It is hypothesized that the dilution of enrofloxacin in some commercially used solutions will not affect the drug's efficacy. The purpose of my study was to test the afore stated hypothesis. In the experiment, stock solutions of enrofloxacin in physiological saline solution, dextrose 5% in water, lactated Ringer's solution, Epi-otic solution, and vinegar. E. coli 2592-2 (standardized solution in saline) was the microorganism chosen to be tested because it is known to be susceptible to enrofloxacin. At time 0, 1 day and 7 days and temperatures of 25°C and 4°C, decreasing tube dilutions (0.125 to 16 μg/ml) of each stock solution and a standard enrofloxacin solution (control) were made using Mueller-Hinton broth. Each dilution of the enrofloxacin solution and an equal amount of bacterial solution were combined and incubated for 24 hours. The resulting growth was read using ultraviolet spectrophotometry and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of enrofloxacin in each solution was determined and compared to the control. Results showed that the MIC's at time   were: control - 8 μg/ml, saline - 0.25 μg/ml, dextrose - 4 μg/ml, ringer - 1 μg/ml, epi-otic - 4 μg/ml, and vinegar - 2 μg/ml. The results for both temperatures at 1 day followed the same pattern. At 7 days, crystals of enrofloxacin were observed in all solutions at both temperatures, hence these solutions were not tested by tube dilution. Therefore, it can be concluded that because the commercial solutions caused a decrease in MIC, they all appear to increase rather than decrease the efficacy of enrofloxacin. The experiment shows that some physiological solutions can alter the efficacy of enrofloxacin when the two are combined for clinical use, but this alteration is favorable.en
dc.format.extent14 pagesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectEnrofloxacinen
dc.subjectdilutionen
dc.subjectefficacyen
dc.subjectminimum inhibitory concentrationen
dc.titleThe stability of enrofloxacinen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentVeterinary Clinical Pharmacologyen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity Undergraduate Research Fellowen
thesis.degree.nameFellows Thesisen
thesis.degree.levelUndergraduateen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record