NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Import demand for United States environmental goods and services
dc.creator | Avery, James Brock | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:47:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:47:41Z | |
dc.date.created | 1997 | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1997-THESIS-A94 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Import demand for U.S. environmental goods and services was made a function of economic (GDP, overall index of economic development, exchange rate, debt service), structural (level of water pollution, index of air pollution), and political (index of democracy, degree of economic liberty) factors in a country. The results show that the overall level of economic development, the level of democratization, and degree of economic liberty were significant factors influencing the import demand for U.S. environmental goods and services. High debt service levels have a negative impact on import demand. Since multilateral funding went to water resource improvements in developing countries, the study found the index of safe water in a country to be a highly significant factor in explaining import demand for U.S. environmental goods and services. The study concludes that U.S. foreign trade policies in the post-cold war era must focus on expanding democratization and economic liberties in developing countries as a means of expanding U.S. trade. Furthermore, the policy must support countries in their effort to get out of debt. The U.S. must support the broader macroeconomic adjustments, especially exchange rate re-alignments undertaken by developing countries. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | agricultural economics. | en |
dc.subject | Major agricultural economics. | en |
dc.title | Import demand for United States environmental goods and services | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | agricultural economics | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.