Show simple item record

dc.creatorSkulteti, Matthew John
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:46:53Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:46:53Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-S586
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references: p. 78-80.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractThe overall goal of this research was to was to gain a better understanding of ringshank nail connections, and to critically evaluate allowable design values for withdrawal. Specific goals ]Included: 1) measuring and comparing withdrawal resistances of ring-shank nails embedded in Southern pine lumber, 2) identifying candidate probability distributions for the withdrawal data, 3) critically evaluating currently published design values for withdrawal resistance of ring-shank nails, and 4) examining the failure mode of nail head pull-through. Withdrawal resistances were measured for 3.76 mm (0. 148 in.), 4.50 mm (0. 177 in.), and 5.26 mm (0.207 in.) diameter galvanized and ungalvanized ring-shank nails from two different manufacturers embedded in Southern pine lumber. Data were statistically evaluated to determine the effects of threading and galvanization on withdrawal resistance. Results indicated that the threading process and galvanization had significant effects on withdrawal resistance. The mean withdrawal values for the 3.76 mm (0. 148 in.) bright and galvanized were, respectively, 64 N/mm (367 lb/in.) and 60 N/mm (343 lb/in.). The means for the 4.50 mm (0. 177 in.) bright and galvanized nails were 76 N/mm (434 lb/in.) and 69 N/mm (396 lb/in.). The mean for the 5.26 mm (0.207 In.) nails was 83 N/mm (474 lb/in.). Coefficients of variation ranged from 0.226 to 0.269. The Welbull and lognormal were the best-fitting probability distributions for the withdrawal data. Current allowable design values were critically evaluated. If the current method of dividing the mean ultimate resistance by a factor of five to obtain design values were used, an increase of 26% to 29% over current design values was noticed. Using the method of 5% parametric tolerance limit, values increased over 50% compared to current design values. Ring-shank nails were found to have approximately twice the withdrawal resistance of smooth-shank nails of the same diameter. ,Although head pull-through was found to have a slight effect on mean ultimate connection strength, the left tall of the strength distribution was not affected. From a design standpoint, head pull-through was not as significant. Current design values appeared to be conservative. Further research is needed on a variety of lumber species and nail sizes.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectagricultural engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor agricultural engineering.en
dc.titleWithdrawal resistance of ring-shank nails embedded in Southern pine lumberen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineagricultural engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access