NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
Electromyographic responses to aerodynamic vs. drop handlebars
dc.creator | Layne, Donald Jodel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-07T22:45:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-07T22:45:21Z | |
dc.date.created | 1996 | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1996-THESIS-L39 | |
dc.description | Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item. | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | en |
dc.description | Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Aerodynamic Handlebars were developed to increase the competitive cyclists aerodynamic advantage. They place the cyclist in a laid out position with the hands stretched out in front similar to a down hill skier "tuck" position. Research has shown that there are no metabolic changes associated with the use of aerodynamic handlebars. These findings are contradicted by anecdotal evidence of specific fatigue and pain in regions such as the upper thigh, buttocks and low back. This anecdotal evidence may point out differences not revealed by metabolic testing. In this study the electromyography of the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and low back were recorded during cycling with both aerodynamic handlebars and drop handlebars, Although there was no significant interaction between the two handlebars there was an interaction between the warm-up and exercise phases of the exercise bouts in the rectus femoris and gluteus maximus. These results indicate that there is possibly a differential response to aerodynamic handlebars as compared to drop handlebars but it is not in the area we expected. | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.subject | kinesiology. | en |
dc.subject | Major kinesiology. | en |
dc.title | Electromyographic responses to aerodynamic vs. drop handlebars | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | kinesiology | en |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | en |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | en |
dc.type.genre | thesis | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.