Show simple item record

dc.creatorDiSalvi, Lawrence Roberts
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:40:14Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:40:14Z
dc.date.created1995
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1995-THESIS-D57
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractJobs requiring workers to stand for prolonged periods are common in industry. People whose work involves standing frequently complain of discomfort, particularly in the legs. A study was conducted to determine the amount of edema that occurs in the lower leg and the level of discomfort people experience as a result of standing on six industrial floor surfaces. Twelve (six female, six male) healthy, college-aged subjects stood for 16 hours (four experimental periods of four hours each)on each of the surfaces. The surfaces used included: two brands of anti-fatigue mat, three types of industrial grating, and concrete. Using water volume displacement, edema of three segments of the right leg (ankle-and-below, calf-and-below, and knee-and-below) was measured for each experiment period. The greatest edema was found in the knee-and-below segment followed by the calf-and-below and ankle-and-below segments. The floor surface (Pr>F=0.110) and the number of weeks the subjects participated in the study (Pr>F=0.140) had no significant effect on the edema of any of the segments. No significant interactions were noted. In the subjective discomfort analysis, significance was found due to gender (Prob=0.033). For the body regions of the legs and back, females generally reported experiencing greater discomfort than males as a result of standing. No significance was found due to floor surface (Prob=0.324) or the number of weeks the subjects participated in the study (Prob=0.116). The subjects ranked the two anti-fatigue mats as being the most preferable of the six surfaces.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectindustrial engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor industrial engineering.en
dc.titleAn evaluation of standing-induced lower leg edema as a function of floor suraceen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineindustrial engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access