Show simple item record

dc.creatorAndrade, Leopoldo
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:39:27Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:39:27Z
dc.date.created1995
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1995-THESIS-A56
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.descriptionIssued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.en
dc.description.abstractFour different breed groups were utilized in this test. Forty three purebred Beefmaster steers, thirty-eight 3/4 Beefmaster steers, twenty-three 1/2 Beefmaster steers and six steers 1/2 Angus 1/4 Hereford, 1/4 Brahman were placed on native pasture for an average of 67 days and in a wheat pasture for 88 days and in the feedlot for 128 days. Significant differences (P<.05) were found between the breed groups for: initial weight on grass, feedlot final weight, carcass weight, actual fat, ribeye area, yield grade and marbling scores. No significant differences (P>.05) were found for: final weight on grass, average daily gain on grass, average daily gain on feed, juiciness, muscle and fiber tenderness, overall tenderness, amount of connective tissue, overall favor intensity and shear force values between the breed groups. The percentage distribution for the quality grade categories (Choice, Select, and Standard) was 2.5, 70.0, and 27.5% for the purebred group; 3.33, 76.67, and 20.0 % for the 3/4 Beefmaster group; 19.0, 71.4, and 9.5% for the 1/2 Beefmaster group; and 50.0, 50.0, and 0 % for the control group. The percentage distribution in the tenderness categories for the different breed groups was as follows-Purebred steers 40% tender, 27.5% acceptable, and 32.5% unacceptable. The 3/4 Beefmaster group had a 56.6% tender, 30.0% acceptable, and 13.3% unacceptable. The 1/2 Beefmaster had a 33.3% tender, 28.5% acceptable, and 38% unacceptable. The control group had a 66.6% tender, and 33.4% acceptable. Among the sires represented in the purebred group significant differences (P<.05) were found for the following traits: initial weight, final weight on grass, average daily gain on grass , final weight in the feedlot , carcass weight, quality grade, actual fat, ribeye area, and yield grade. No significant differences (P>.05) were found for juiciness, muscle and fiber tenderness, overall tenderness, connective tissue, overall flavor intensity and shear force. For the sires represented with crossbred progeny significant differences (P<.05) were found for the final weight on grass, carcass weight and ribeye area. No significant differences (P>.05) were observed among the sires in the rest of the performance, carcass, or sensory traits evaluated.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectanimal science.en
dc.subjectMajor animal science.en
dc.titleBeefmaster progeny evaluation for growth traits and carcass meriten
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplineanimal scienceen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access