Show simple item record

dc.creatorPrabhakar, Dayakar
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:38:02Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:38:02Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-P895
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractMost signalized interchanges in Texas are tight urban diamond interchanges of freeways having one-way frontage roads. At these interchanges, traffic actuated control with improper location of detectors may result in inefficient traffic operations. Further, the signal designer usually does not have published guidelines on the optimal location of detectors at diamond interchanges based on traffic conditions. Therefore, application guidelines on the placement of detectors at diamond interchanges are needed which would result in efficient traffic operations. This research addressed the problem of determining the effective placement of inductive loop detectors on frontage roads at diamond interchanges to minimize total interchange delay. TEXAS Model for diamond interchanges was used to perform simulation studies to determine the optimal location of loop detectors on the frontage roads of diamond interchanges. "Figure 3 and Figure 4" signal operations were the two phasing strategies considered for study. This research developed a set of detector application guidelines which were shown by TEXAS Model to provide efficient traffic operations. When a 40-foot long stop line detector and a 6-foot long advance detector are used on the frontage roads, it appears that a 100-foot setback distance for the advance detector results in the lowest interchange delay for both "Figure 3 and Figure 4" phasing sequences. The I 00-foot setback distance produces less delay than detector layouts having longer advance detector setback distances. In addition, total interchange delay appears to be very sensitive to increase in U-turn volume for the "Figure 4" phasing sequence.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleEffective placement of detectors at diamond interchangesen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access