Show simple item record

dc.creatorHorne, Gregory Alan
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:36:44Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:36:44Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-H8153
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractWhile the NCBRP program has evaluated the fatigue strength for many of the welded details that are typically used in highway bridge construction, only those details which have been the subject of recent research projects are specified in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges (1992). Many existing details resemble those currently covered by specification, but closer inspection of these details reveals inherent differences. A coped longitudinal attachment intersecting a transverse stiffener is an example of such a detail. In order to measure the severity of different intersection geometries, the finite element stress analysis method was used in order to obtain the SCF for each detail. The SCF for each coped detail was compared to that of a base model with no cope. The non coped model signifies the SCF that correlates to an AASHTO Category E detail. The SCF for a Category C detail was also obtained. The severity of the cope detail was determined by the relationship of its SCF to the SCF of the Category C and E detail. The studied parameters for this investigation were gusset plate width, size of the cope, and the thickness of the gusset and web plate. From this investigation several conclusions could be made. The cope in the longitudinal plate should not be smaller than one inch. Smaller gap sizes can reduce the fatigue strength of the detail when compared to a slightly larger cope size. As the cope size is reduced, the two welds come close together and the SCF for each weld toe superimposed on each other. The close proximity of the weld can also lead to large restraint forces in the weld region, which also reduces the detail's fatigue strength. The best possible category for a detail with a cope is Category D. However, depending on the size of the cope and thickness ratio between the plate and web, this category can be reduced to Category E. An equation was developed that would predict the AASHTO fatigue category for a given plate width, cope size, and thickness ratio.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleStress concentrations at longitudinal-transverse stiffener plate intersectionsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access