Show simple item record

dc.creatorBiles, Daniel Franklin
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:35:35Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:35:35Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-B5953
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative landfill liner materials that could be utilized in conjunction with current liners in order to improve the liner's performance by preventing the release of hazardous chemicals into the subsurface environment. Five alternative liner materials were tested in this study: granular activated carbon, lignite, compost, peat moss, and powdered activated carbon produced from cotton gin trash. Three volatile organic compounds are used in this study: Benzene, Toluene, and O-Xylene. The linear Langmuir isotherm coefficients, Qo, and b, and the linear adsorption distribution coefficient K,,.,, were determined by equilibrium studies for each chemical and material. The retardation factor, R., was calculated from the breakthrough curve data for each combination of chemical and material. The cotton gin trash dissolved in the presence of each of the solvents so no data is presented for this material. Because activated carbon sorbed all of the chemical during the isotherm testing, no data could be collected for the extraction procedure. Lignite has the highest adsorption capacity of the three remaining materials and the second highest retardation factor. Activated carbon has the highest retardation factor of each of the chemicals, as expected. The results show that the adsorption capacity and the retardation factor are more dependent on surface area and pore diameter than on the organic carbon content of the test materials. Lignite is the leading candidate after this study to be used as an additive material in liner design. However, further evaluation of these liner materials must be accomplished in order to determine which material, if any, could be added to the design of landfill liners to aid in preventing the release of hazardous chemicals into the subsurface environment and groundwater supply.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleEvaluation of alternative leachate liner materialsen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access