Show simple item record

dc.creatorBhagat, Victor
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T22:35:34Z
dc.date.available2012-06-07T22:35:34Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1994-THESIS-B575
dc.descriptionDue to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en
dc.description.abstractReducing congestion on U.S. urban roadways has become a top priority of state departments of transportation nationwide. The development and construction of freeway management systems have recently begun to help reduce this problem. Today, modem traffic control systems are necessary to obtain maximum possible efficiency from our freeway systems. A major component of freeway management systems is the induction loop detector. This research effort evaluated the methods by which crosstalk could be controlled effectively in a freeway management situation and, thereby, make the most efficient use of induction loop detectors. Tests were conducted to evaluate the distance at which no crosstalk was observed between two adjacent induction loop detectors. Tests were also conducted to measure the potential of crosstalk within a controller cabinet and in twisted and untwisted lead wires. As a part of this ongoing research, attention was also given to determine the distance of no spillover at detector unit sensitivity-settings of Low, Medium, and High. All of these tests were performed using two different types of detector units, viz., Detector Systems stand-alone detector units, and Naztec rackmounted units. It was observed that a distance of 48 inches (1.21 meters) between the edges of two adjacent induction loop detectors eliminated crosstalk between them. The tests also indicated that there was no crosstalk on twisted and untwisted lead wires. Furthermore, there was no measurable evidence of crosstalk in the controller cabinet. Three different speeds of 20, 40, and 60 mph (32, 64, and 97 km/h, respectively) were used to study the detection zone between two loop detectors connected to the same detector unit. It was observed that, if two 6 feet-by-6 feet (1.83 by 1.83 meters) loop detectors are placed at a spacing of 20 feet (6 meters) from lead-edge to lead-edge, they act as a single long loop detector. It has been established that the use of multiple small loops is more advantageous than using a single long loop detector.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries in 2008. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.subjectcivil engineering.en
dc.subjectMajor civil engineering.en
dc.titleInduction loop detector systems crosstalken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.disciplinecivil engineeringen
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.type.genrethesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access