Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRichardson, James W.
dc.contributor.advisorRister, M. Edward
dc.creatorBise, Elizabeth Hart
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-15T00:00:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-16T01:43:56Z
dc.date.available2010-01-15T00:00:59Z
dc.date.available2010-01-16T01:43:56Z
dc.date.created2007-08
dc.date.issued2009-05-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1402
dc.description.abstractTexas is the leading U.S. producer of cotton, and the U.S. is the largest international market supplier of cotton. Risks and uncertainties plague Texas cotton producers with unpredictable weather, insects, diseases, and price variability. Risk management studies have examined the risk reducing capabilities of alternative management strategies, but few have looked at the interaction of using several strategies in different combinations. The research in this study focuses on managing risk faced by cotton farmers in Texas using irrigation, put options, and yield insurance. The primary objective was to analyze the interactions of irrigation, put options, and yield insurance as risk management strategies on the economic viability of a 1,000 acre cotton farm in the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of Texas. The secondary objective was to determine the best combination of these strategies for decision makers with alternative preferences for risk aversion. Stochastic values for yields and prices were used in simulating a whole-farm financial statement for a 1000 acre furrow irrigated cotton farm in the LRGV with three types of risk management strategies. Net returns were simulated using a multivariate empirical distribution for 16 risk management scenarios. The scenarios were ranked across a range of risk aversion levels using stochastic efficiency with respect to a function. Analyses for risk averse decision makers showed that multiple irrigations are preferred, and that yield insurance is strongly preferred at lower irrigation levels. The benefits to purchasing put options increase with yields, so they are more beneficial when higher yields are expected from applying more irrigation applications.en
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectcottonen
dc.subjectrisken
dc.subjectmultivariate empiricalen
dc.subjectLower Rio Grande Valleyen
dc.subjectirrigationen
dc.subjectcrop insuranceen
dc.subjectput optionsen
dc.subjecthedgingen
dc.titleMitigating cotton revenue risk through irrigation, insurance, and/or hedgingen
dc.typeBooken
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.departmentAgricultural Economicsen
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural Economicsen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPiccinni, Giovanni
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRobinson, John R.C.
dc.type.genreElectronic Thesisen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginborn digitalen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record