Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSilvy, Nova J.
dc.creatorSteinbach, Donny W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T20:58:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T20:58:17Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-794261
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the various types of leasing enterprises in the Rio Grande Plains and Edwards Plateau resource regions of Texas used to market recreational ranch resources, (2) determine the costs and returns of each of the various types of leasing enterprises described, and (3) determine landowner/manager opinion of constraints and values in operating recreational leasing operations. Based on a survey of 89 landowners/managers operating separate hunting lease divisions, 9 types of leasing operations were categorized. Enterprise budgets were determined for 6 randomly selected lease types and 4 case histories of leasing operations. Landowners in these 2 regions of Texas indicated the value of private ownership rights was important but that income from leasing recreational ranch resources was more important. There were other concerns of obtaining quality persons to lease these property rights. There were regional differences as to the reasons for leasing. Biological constraints such as high deer densities in the Edwards Plateau and trophy deer hunting in the Rio Grande Plains influenced leasing in those areas. The most common advertising method used to market hunting was referrals of other hunters to landowners. Eighty-five percent of the divisions within the Edwards Plateau were grouped into 5 types of similar operations and 65% of the divisions in the Rio Grande Plains were clustered in four groups, with about 85% of the variables being similar in both. Break-even cost analyses indicated low-cash costs in most enterprises. However, in most that had negative net incomes, the non-cash cost was related to this loss. High opportunity-grazing costs were a decisive factor in the Edwards Plateau. Deer-proof fencing in some of the case histories contributed to the high depreciation cost. Size of the ranch was the only factor that seemed to affect the gross income.en
dc.format.extentxii, 101 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectHunting leasesen
dc.subjectShooting preservesen
dc.subjectEconomic aspectsen
dc.subjectWildlife managementen
dc.subjectEconomic aspectsen
dc.subjectMajor wildlife and fisheries sciencesen
dc.subject.classification1988 Dissertation S819
dc.subject.lcshWildlife managementen
dc.subject.lcshEconomic aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.subject.lcshHunting leasesen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.subject.lcshShooting preservesen
dc.subject.lcshEconomic aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshTexasen
dc.titleEconomics and operational characteristics of recreational leasing in the Edwards Plateau and Rio Grande Plains of Texasen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberConner, J. Richard
dc.contributor.committeeMemberInglis, Jack M.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberShult, Milo J.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc20449795


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access