Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBenjamin, James J.
dc.creatorDavid, Jeanne Marie
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T20:58:13Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T20:58:13Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-794016
dc.descriptionTypescript (photocopy).en
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relationship between defined benefit pension plan data and the market value of the firm's common equity. An equity valuation model is developed which relates the firm's equity value to (1) the expected after tax earnings before interest and pension expenses, (2) the after tax book value of debt, (3) the market value of preferred stock, (4) the growth in total assets, (5) the firm's asset beta, and (6) the unfunded or overfunded pension obligation. This study provides evidence that equity value decreases with unfunded pension benefits and increases with overfunded pension benefits. It seems that the under and overfunded vested pension benefits and the under and overfunded total pension benefits both provide good indicators of equity value when used in conjunction with expected earnings, debt, preferred stock, growth and asset beta. The pension expense did not provide a significant relationship with firm equity value. This was contrary to the results of an earlier study which found pension expense to be more clearly reflected in firm equity value than unfunded vested pension benefits or unfunded prior service costs. The current findings may be attributable to the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 36 which set more stringent rules on the appropriate determination of accumulated vested and nonvested pension benefits. However, with the new regulations set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87 for determining pension expense, this pension expense may yet prove to be a better indicator of firm value. Using the net unfunded or overfunded benefits or using the pension benefits and the pension plan assets both provided good indicators of firm common equity value. Finally there is some limited evidence that the overfunded pension benefits may be valued differently from the underfunded pension benefits.en
dc.format.extentxiv, 198 leavesen
dc.format.mediumelectronicen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMajor accountingen
dc.subject.classification1988 Dissertation D249
dc.subject.lcshDefined benefit pension plansen
dc.subject.lcshPension trustsen
dc.subject.lcshFinanceen
dc.titleThe effect of defined benefit pension plans on corporate valuation : an empirical investigationen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.degree.grantorTexas A&M Universityen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen
thesis.degree.namePh. Den
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDubofsky, David
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKratchman, Stanley H.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLongnecker, Michael T.
dc.type.genredissertationsen
dc.type.materialtexten
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digitalen
dc.publisher.digitalTexas A&M University. Libraries
dc.identifier.oclc20432709


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access