NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.
A comparison of the zone of proximal development in Anglo and Hispanic learning disabled elementary pupils
dc.contributor.advisor | Palmer, Douglas J. | |
dc.creator | Hernandez, Arthur Ezequiel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-07T16:54:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-07T16:54:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-746710 | |
dc.description | Typescript (photocopy). | en |
dc.description.abstract | The primary purpose of this research was to examine the differences, if any, in the zone of proximal development of learning disabled Anglo and Hispanic pupils. The zone of proximal development is defined as the difference between a pupil's unaided performance and performance attainable with the assistance of an adult or more capable peer. Major questions of the study concerned the differential performance gain of Anglo and Hispanic learning disabled elementary pupils, following intervention, on component measures of popular intelligence tests, and the degree of transfer demonstrated by these pupils on conceptually similar tasks. The sample consisted of twenty-four dyads of fourth to sixth grade elementary school pupils identified as learning disabled matched in IQ, (within +/- 1 standard error of measurement) grade, gender, and initial performance on the criteria measures, selected from a small rural school district in the Southwest. Hispanic pupils included in this study were assessed as functional in English by performance on the Language Assessment Scale (LAS), using school district criteria and records. Results of this study indicate a significant difference in task performance on all tasks following training for both groups. Large zones of proximal development were demonstrated with the Hispanic sample for Digit Span and related tasks, but not for Block Design and related tasks. These results are discussed in light of other research findings indicating a difference in task difficulty for the two groups. Recommendations for future research are provided. | en |
dc.format.extent | ix, 158 leaves | en |
dc.format.medium | electronic | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | This thesis was part of a retrospective digitization project authorized by the Texas A&M University Libraries. Copyright remains vested with the author(s). It is the user's responsibility to secure permission from the copyright holder(s) for re-use of the work beyond the provision of Fair Use. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Major educational psychology | en |
dc.subject.classification | 1987 Dissertation H557 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Learning disabled children | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Testing | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Hispanic American children | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Testing | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cognition in children | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Educational tests and measurements | en |
dc.title | A comparison of the zone of proximal development in Anglo and Hispanic learning disabled elementary pupils | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Educational Psychology | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Texas A&M University | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. in Educational Psychology | en |
thesis.degree.level | Doctorial | en |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Ash, Michael J. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Barker, Donald G. | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Garcia, Jesus | |
dc.type.genre | dissertations | en |
dc.type.material | text | en |
dc.format.digitalOrigin | reformatted digital | en |
dc.publisher.digital | Texas A&M University. Libraries | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 18588399 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Digitized Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Texas A&M University Theses and Dissertations (1922–2004)
Request Open Access
This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.